Diddy Accused Of Blacklisting Artists In Secret Footage

Diddy was one of many largest names in music for a very long time. Nevertheless, if there may be something that the numerous lawsuits and allegations have instructed, it is that he was fairly abusive along with his powers. In some way although, there’s one other manner wherein the mogul was in a position to loom massive.

In line with The Submit Millennial, some undercover video footage hears a document government accuse Diddy of blacklisting musicians. Or he not less than had the facility to take action says Motti Shulman, former senior VP of Rhythm Promotion at Atlantic Data. The dialog was recorded in secret by O’Keefe Media Group.

Shulman says Diddy would take movies of artists at his events, doubtlessly the freak-offs, and use that in opposition to them in the event that they tried to get higher document offers. “[Sean Combs] had extra to do than simply whether or not you bought a document deal or not, like, he may blacklist you. Particularly after you went to one in all his events and it appeared enjoyable, and there have been ladies and medicines, however now he’s obtained you on video doing bizarre sh*t.”

However he did not cease there. Shulman goes on to say that he did work with the Unhealthy Boy CEO at one level. However from the start, he did not like him one bit.

“Diddy at his core, is a nasty man. I did work with him. He’s a f*cking a*shole and I knew that from the get go.”

As of but, the incarcerated rapper hasn’t responded to the footage. Furthermore, there isn’t any verification that this tactic was put to make use of. But it surely does not imply that individuals will not proceed to view him in a adverse gentle.

Apparently, although, this new undercover clip surfaces amid questions of how 50 Cent‘s Netflix docuseries was put collectively. In Sean Combs: The Reckoning, there is a second the place Diddy speaks to his lawyer, Marc Agnifilo, proper earlier than his September 2024 arrest.

Michael Oberlies, Diddy’s private videographer cleared the air as to how that piece of content material got here to be. “For over two years, now we have been engaged on a mission profiling Sean ‘Diddy’ Combs. The footage in query was not launched by me or anybody approved to deal with Sean Combs’ supplies; it was by a 3rd social gathering who coated for me for 3 days whereas I used to be out of state. This incident had nothing to do with any charge dispute or contract challenge. The actions of the events concerned mirror the shortage of integrity each storyteller ought to uphold. Taking footage supposed for our mission to advance a story that was not our personal is each unethical and unacceptable.”