“Black People Are Not Apes.”
That sentence shouldn’t be obligatory in 2026. During Black History Month. It shouldn’t should be printed, displayed, or defended contained in the United States Capitol. And but, there it was, elevated as a type of protest throughout final night time’s State of the Union.
But the tougher reality is that the actual humiliation wasn’t the existence of the signal. It was that that is what the Democratic Party’s opposition appears like proper now.
An indication.
A sentence.
A placard held at chest degree whereas energy walks previous it unmoved.
That shouldn’t be resistance.
While government authority expands, federal companies are reshaped, immigration enforcement hardens, individuals die in ICE custody, civil rights protections are dismantled, and courts are stocked for many years, the Democratic Party lifts a slogan into the air and calls it confrontation. While Trump continues deploying language that dehumanizes total communities, the Democratic Party retains responding with symbolism.
The Party’s response retains shrinking into gestures, rigorously timed dissent, contained outrage, and social media and television-ready disruption that dissolves the second the cameras minimize away. And the steadiness of energy stays precisely the place it was. The Party appears trapped in a cycle of expressive resistance that’s excessive on ethical readability and low on structural consequence.
Rep. Al Green’s signal says “Black People Are Not Apes!”
Fine.
But the place is the laws that blocks the coverage structure behind the rhetoric?
Where is the procedural warfare? Where is the coordinated, relentless obstruction that makes authoritarian overreach and structural racism unsustainable?
Trump doesn’t function inside a shame-based political framework. He doesn’t alter his habits in response to public rebuke. His model is defiance. His enchantment is confrontation. His energy base rewards escalation, not introspection.
So what precisely is an indication about zoology supposed to perform?
It doesn’t sluggish government orders. It doesn’t redirect federal companies. It doesn’t constrain enforcement mechanisms. It doesn’t construct legislative coalitions. It registers ethical objection, after which energy continues shifting.
For years now, Democratic management has handled spectacle as technique. The assumption seems to be that publicity alone weakens authoritarian and racist habits. That if voters simply see sufficient cruelty, sufficient extremism, sufficient provocation, they’ll recoil. But spectacle is Trump’s native language. He thrives inside it. Meeting spectacle with spectacle shouldn’t be counter-programming. It’s amplification.
Meanwhile, communities on the bottom are coping with materials penalties: deportations, regulatory rollbacks, large job losses, starvation and illness, assaults on public training, erosion of voting protections, and judicial appointments that may form legislation for many years. None of that shifts as a result of a congressman held up an indication.
If Democrats wish to be taken critically as a counterweight, they have to reveal one thing greater than ethical differentiation. They should reveal strategic self-discipline.
And what would that appear to be?
That would imply procedural obstruction the place attainable. Coordinated state-level resistance. Forcing votes that create political value. Sustained investigations tied to messaging. Using committee assignments as leverage factors as an alternative of press platforms. Understanding that authoritarian drift is institutional and never theatrical.
Black voters, particularly, usually are not confused about what’s at stake. We perceive dehumanization. We acknowledge coded rhetoric. We know the way language turns into coverage. What is tougher to just accept is watching the Party that depends most closely on our turnout reply to these stakes with gestures that really feel emotionally satisfying however politically weightless.
There is a widening hole between the size of the risk and the size of the response. And that hole erodes confidence. If a president is consolidating energy, the opposition should reply with coordinated structural countermeasures, not symbolic disruptions designed for digital camera cycles.
An indication can seize consideration. It can’t shift authority. A slogan can development. It can’t dismantle coverage. The Democratic Party’s problem proper now could be credibility. Not rhetorical credibility however strategic credibility. Voters have to see proof that management understands energy as one thing to be exercised, not merely critiqued.
Because the uncomfortable actuality is that authoritarian actions and white supremacist campaigns don’t collapse underneath ethical stress. They are resisted by way of organized, sustained institutional drive. That requires threat and escalation. It requires shifting past decorum when decorum is being weaponized.
“Black People Are Not Apes” ought to by no means need to be declared inside Congress. But the deeper indictment is that if this declaration is essentially the most seen type of resistance we will muster on this political second, then the issue is greater than rhetoric.
If a sentence on an indication is the sharpest device Democrats are keen to make use of, then the issue shouldn’t be Trump.
It’s muscle.
Dr. Stacey Patton is an award-winning journalist and creator of “Spare The Kids: Why Whupping Children Won’t Save Black America” and the forthcoming “Strung Up: The Lynching of Black Children In Jim Crow America.” Read her Substack here.
SEE ALSO:
State Of The Union 2026: This Man Be Lying Edition
President Trump Sang The Same Old Song During State Of The Union Address
About The Author
