[Op-Ed] Why Redistricting Is A Test Of Courage We Can’t Fail

Supply: The Austin American-Statesman/Hearst Newspapers / Getty

Historical past tells us that moments of nice democratic disaster don’t ask us to recite our values louder. They ask us to danger them, to check them, and to adapt them. As we speak is a type of moments, and that’s why braveness is the phrase of the hour. Take a look at Texas, the place Republican lawmakers have handed maps mid-decade and out of cycle, designed to cement their management and rig upcoming elections as a result of they understand how unpopular they’re. These maps don’t simply form the following cycle—they’re a deliberate try and entrench minority rule and insulate these in energy from the desire of the individuals.

That type of maneuvering is what occurs when braveness is absent—not simply in resisting authoritarian ways, however in rethinking our personal methods. And but, when most individuals speak about braveness at this time, they imply one thing far totally different.

Everybody calls for braveness. Day by day, I open social media and see requires it—braveness to talk up, to make statements, to submit positions of ethical excessive floor, and to carry out braveness for everybody watching.

However increasingly more, I believe we’re lacking what braveness must imply proper now. Braveness isn’t just repeating the issues we have now all the time believed to be morally proper. Braveness is difficult these beliefs when the circumstances wherein we constructed them have utterly modified.

As a result of right here is the reality:

The excessive floor doesn’t win.

The excessive floor doesn’t shield.

The excessive floor doesn’t persuade.

Historical past offers us the receipts. Throughout Reconstruction, Black political energy expanded underneath the promise of the thirteenth, 14th, and fifteenth Amendments. However whereas white supremacists organized by violence and terror, too many leaders clung to the ethical excessive floor with out constructing the equipment of safety. The end result was the collapse of Reconstruction, the rise of Jim Crow, and the ceding of generations of floor. Excessive floor with out energy paved the best way for legalized segregation.

We’re standing in one other a type of moments. As a civil rights legal professional with virtually 20 years of expertise on this discipline, I’ve lengthy believed that partisan gerrymandering—and gerrymandering typically—is unhealthy. It dilutes the voting energy of Black voters, skews election outcomes, and makes our democracy much less consultant. That’s the ethical excessive floor.

However I additionally dwell in actuality. Conservatives have been gerrymandering districts for almost half a century, and now they’re bending over backwards to tilt the stability of energy on the request of an authoritarian regime. In the meantime, the opposite aspect has largely clung to precept, passing “mannequin” reforms in largely non-conservative locations whereas ceding floor on the mapping of energy. The end result? The convergence of gerrymandered districts, the elimination of pre-clearance, voter suppression legal guidelines, the seize of the judiciary, the dismantling of the DOJ’s Civil Rights Division, and aggressive state-level redistricting underneath Republican trifectas. Collectively, these forces create the right storm for a neo-segregationist ethno-state being imposed on us all.

We should be clear: redistricting energy lies squarely inside state legislatures. Meaning the hazard is twofold. On the federal aspect, redrawing congressional maps can warp illustration in Washington for a era or extra, particularly given this Administration’s need to rig the decennial census. On the state aspect, failing to contest gerrymandering means conceding maps that lock in single-party trifectas—governor, home, and senate—that may churn out wave after wave of huge, ugly payments attacking our freedoms. Our freedom to vote, our freedom to make selections about our our bodies, and our freedom to dwell freely with out discrimination. To disregard both stage is to depart entire communities on the mercy of entrenched minority rule. And historical past exhibits us that Black communities are all the time the primary targets—dealing with the earliest, deepest, and most enduring harms when illustration is stripped away.

Each time we refuse to contest energy on the terrain the place it’s being fought, we hand the opposition not simply maps, however legislatures. And when legislatures are misplaced, trifectas observe. And with trifectas come the payments that rework neo-segregationist ideology into regulation—and strip away the protections our communities rely upon. The hazard isn’t just one congressional map. The hazard is that entire states are being locked into single-party management, paving the best way for a constitutional conference inside two cycles. And with that conference comes the very actual risk of stripping the structure of the thirteenth, 14th and fifteenth Amendments—dismantling birthright citizenship, gutting equal safety, and rolling again the core ensures of civil rights regulation—giving the far proper precisely what they search: the liberty to oppress. That’s the price of clinging to precept with out energy—watching the very foundations of our democracy rewritten whereas we maintain quick to the excessive floor.

That is ideology versus actuality. Ideology says gerrymandering is unhealthy and we must always reject it outright. Actuality says refusing to combat hearth with hearth leaves us scorched. Ideology says we must always cling to purity. Actuality says purity with out energy gained’t cease what’s already unfolding: an administration brazenly threatening to ship Medicaid recipients to “work within the fields,” dismantling antidiscrimination protections, and pushing towards a nationwide “white major” by gerrymandering and voter suppression.

So the query shouldn’t be whether or not partisan gerrymandering is unhealthy—we all know it’s. The query is whether or not we may have the braveness to problem even our deepest-held beliefs as a way to meet the second. As a result of what’s at stake isn’t just the excessive floor. What’s at stake is the very floor we stand on—our democracy itself.

That’s why the letter delivered by Coloration Of Change and a coalition of next-generation civil rights and democracy organizations is so pressing. We signify thousands and thousands of voters and are demanding that governors and legislative leaders in fifteen states instantly start redistricting forward of the 2026 cycle. Braveness at this time should imply reimagining our methods, even when it forces us to confront what feels uncomfortable, and utilizing each lawful instrument at our disposal to make sure voters can’t be silenced by maps designed to erase our energy. That’s why we should have the braveness not simply to face for democracy, however to defend it with every little thing we have now. As a result of if we hesitate whereas the opposite aspect rigs the maps, we hand them the long run. —

Portia Allen-Kyle is a civil rights legal professional, former Senior Advisor for Civil Rights on the US Division of Transportation, and the Interim Government Director at Coloration Of Change

Texas County Cuts 100 Polling Stations, Limits Early Voting

Texas Rep. Nicole Collier Being Held Hostage At State Home

Texas Democrats Will Return To State After Particular Session Ends

Eric Holder Strategizes In opposition to Gerrymandering With Home Democrats

Gov. Greg Abbott Orders Arrest Of Texas Democrats

Calif. Gov. Gavin Newsom Counters Texas Redistricting Effort

Texas Gov. Greg Abbott Sues To Take away Democratic Rep In Redistricting Combat

Texas Creates 5 New Home Seats In Areas Trump Received In 2024

Texas Dems Combat Redistricting Effort By Filibusters

Texas State Dems Break Quorum To Stop Redistricting Vote

US Senator John Cornyn, FBI Workforce Up To Hunt Texas Democrats

Critics Name Texas Governor’s New Congressional Map Gerrymandering