Snoop Dogg’s Cousin Is At The Center Of Spotify Lawsuit That Implicates Drake

Drake will not be on the epicenter, however he finds himself in one other authorized predicament this week. On Sunday, November 2, Spotify was hit with a federal class motion lawsuit, with “members of most people” accusing them of turning a “blind eye” to Drizzy benefitting from “billions” of botted streams.

The authorized submitting was despatched to the U.S. District Courtroom for the Central District of California.

One fascinating angle amidst of all of this although goes again to these suing the streaming big. West Coast rapper RBX was one these recognized amongst the gang, and he simply so occurs to be a cousin to Snoop Dogg and Daz Dillinger.

He was a signee of Demise Row Data from 1992-1995. Furthermore, he landed on a handful of massive releases on the imprint again then. These included Dr. Dre‘s The Power and Snoop’s Doggystyle. RBX then went on to hitch Dre’s then newly based Aftermath from ’96-2000.

Whereas RBX almost certainly does not have any allegiance to Drake, it’s fascinating to see this given Snoop’s respect for The Boy. But it surely’s additionally value clarifying that the “One Dance” hitmaker is not a defendant on this swimsuit.

However as for the contents of the submitting, these suing Spotify allege that Drake’s catalog has been gaining a plethora of faux streams from January 2022 via September 2025.

This federal case is making an attempt to level out that Spotify has been brazenly ignorant to this alleged reality. “This mass-scale fraudulent streaming causes large monetary hurt to professional artists, songwriters, producers and different rightsholders whose proportional share is decreased because of fraudulent stream inflation on Spotify’s platform,” it reads per NBC Information.

Sadly, this isn’t all Drake has on his plate proper now. Final week, him, Adin Ross, and on-line on line casino big Stake have been hit with two class motion lawsuits. People in Missouri and New Mexico are accusing the trio of selling unlawful and predatory playing.

Missouri’s submitting reads, “Drake’s function as Stake’s unofficial mascot is quietly corrosive… He’s glamorizing the platform to tens of millions of impressionable followers, a lot of whom deal with his wild betting habits like gospel.” Adin Ross just lately addressed the claims, labeling all of them “bullsh*t.”