One L After One other!
Supply: Kevin Winter/Getty Photographs
Social media is ABLAZE over Drake shedding his defamation lawsuit in opposition to Common Music Group in response to Kendrick Lamar‘s now-iconic diss monitor, ‘Not Like Us.’
The Hollywood Reporter reviews that U.S. District Choose Jeannette Vargas dominated that the lyrics of “Not Like Us” are expressions of opinion quite than statements of truth.
“An inexpensive listener couldn’t have concluded that ‘Not Like Us’ was conveying goal details about Drake,” she dominated.
As beforehand reported, Drake accused UMG of orchestrating a “monetary conspiracy” by selling Lamar’s music on the expense of his model, making secret funds, and lowering licensing affords to 3rd events to suppress Drake’s worth throughout contract talks.
His workforce additionally demanded UMG produce redacted variations of Lamar’s report contract (claiming it was unfairly censored) and documentation involving prior label censorship (citing Pusha T’s “Story of Adidon”) as precedent.
However in her ruling, Choose Vargas refused to deal with rap battle lyrics as binding statements of truth.
The Hollywood Reporter notes that Vargas emphasised that diss tracks by nature use hyperbolic, provocative language:
“The common listener will not be below the impression {that a} diss monitor is the product of a considerate or disinterested investigation,” she wrote. She added that the “rhetorical fashion, tone, and context, filled with profanity and rhetorical flourish, clearly mark the tune as expressive opinion quite than factual assertion.”
For these retaining rating at dwelling, that is all began again in November 2024 when Drake alleged that UMG and Spotify deployed bots to “artificially inflate” the success of Kendrick Lamar’s “Not Like Us,” violating the RICO Act.
When that fizzled out, the Canadian rapper filed one other lawsuit accusing the music large of knowingly defaming him.
His criticism centered round “Not Like Us,” which famously referred to Drake as a “baby predator,” prompting the hitmaking artist to allege that UMG not solely distributed this tune however promoted it by means of “unlawful means.”
Naturally, UMG vehemently denied the claims, asserting that the notion they might “search to hurt the repute of any artist—not to mention Drake—is illogical.”
“Plaintiff, some of the profitable recording artists of all time, misplaced a rap battle that he provoked and through which he willingly participated,” UMG’s attorneys wrote in a submitting asking for a dismissal. “As an alternative of accepting the loss just like the unbothered rap artist he typically claims to be, he has sued his personal report label in a misguided try and salve his wounds.”
Should you had been advising Drake, what would you advocate he do subsequent? Inform us down beneath and peep the social media hysteria over Drake’s newest L on the flip.
About The Author
